Law 104/1992 grants employees three days of paid monthly leave to care for family members with severe disabilities. This is a fundamental protection, but one that is sometimes misused. The abuse of Law 104 leave is not just a contractual violation: according to the Supreme Court, it also constitutes fraud against INPS, which pays the salary for the absence days. Ponzi Intelligence gathers objective, documented evidence in full compliance with the law, enabling the company to protect itself.
Article 33 of Law 104/1992 provides that leave must be used for the care of the disabled family member. The Supreme Court has established important principles over time: even a single episode of abuse can justify dismissal for just cause (Cass. no. 17102/2021); care need not be continuous but must be ‘adequate’ (Cass. no. 5906/2025); using leave for activities entirely unrelated to care violates the principles of good faith (Cass. no. 6468/2024, no. 11999/2024, no. 13274/2024). However, brief personal breaks (such as shopping) do not automatically constitute abuse (Cass. no. 24130/2024). The employer may legitimately engage a private investigation agency to carry out checks even outside working hours (Cass. no. 4984/2014).
Yes. The Supreme Court (no. 4984/2014) confirmed the legitimacy of checks via private investigators even outside working hours. The employer has the right to verify that leave is used for the care of the disabled family member and not for unrelated personal purposes.
Yes, according to the Supreme Court (no. 17102/2021). Even a single episode of abuse of Law 104 leave can justify dismissal for just cause, as it irreparably breaches the trust relationship with the employer and the principles of good faith.
Care need not be continuous throughout the day but must be ‘adequate’ (Cass. 2025). Brief personal breaks (shopping, having a coffee) are tolerable if care remains the main activity. Abuse occurs when leave is used for activities entirely unrelated to care: work, sport, travel, extended leisure.
Yes. The Supreme Court has clarified that abuse of Law 104 leave constitutes fraud against INPS, since leave days are paid by the social security institution. It is a criminal offence prosecutable ex officio (aggravated fraud against a public body, Art. 640 Criminal Code), so no company report is necessary.
Generally at least 2-3 leave days are monitored to build a meaningful evidentiary framework. The entire process, from engagement to report, typically takes 2-4 weeks. Ponzi defines the timeline in the initial operational plan.
Contact us for any information using the contact information below. We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
800.013.458
ponzispa@ponzi.com
